DAC6 impacts multinational groups across all industries – here’s why! - Tax and Legal blog


With the summer holidays coming to an end, it is the perfect time to continue or start thinking about how the latest amendment to the EU’s Directive on Administrative Cooperation (“DAC6”) impacts your organisation and initiate the necessary steps to ensure operational readiness in anticipation of the first reporting in summer 2020.

Many people are surprised when they hear that DAC6 affects not only tax advisors, lawyers and financial services providers, but also multinational groups across all industries (even if headquartered in Switzerland). In this blog, which is part of a series, we provide examples of how multinational groups could be involved in reportable arrangements, discuss reporting obligations, and share our views on what should be done next.

Which arrangements are reportable under DAC6?

To quickly recap, DAC6 requires reporting of ‘reportable cross-border arrangements’ (RCBAs). These are arrangements that:

  • concern either more than one EU member state or an EU member state and a third country, including Switzerland (i.e. ‘cross-border arrangements’); and
  • have at least one of the characteristics or features that are listed in the Annex to the Directive, as an indication of aggressive tax planning or tax avoidance (so-called ‘hallmarks’).

A key feature of DAC6 is its retrospective reporting requirement. This means not only RCBAs entered after ‘go-live’ on 1 July 2020 are reportable, but also RCBAs implemented between 25 June 2018 and 30 June 2020.

Examples of reportable arrangements involving multinational groups

Multinational groups across all industries are regularly involved in cross-border arrangements in connection with intra-group transactions or restructurings. Every transaction between a Swiss company and its EU subsidiary comes within this definition and would be reportable under DAC6 if it meets one of the hallmarks. In addition, an RCBA may arise through interaction with third parties, e.g. tax advisors.

The non-exhaustive examples below describe common situations where multinationals may be involved in RCBAs:

  • Cross-border group restructurings, e.g. a centralisation of functions involving at least one EU group entity, where the transaction significantly reduces the projected EBIT of the transferring entity.
  • Cross-border transfers of ‘hard-to-value intangibles’ between group entities: these could include situations where the intangible is only partially developed at the time of the transfer or is not expected to be exploited commercially until several years following the transfer.
  • Deductible payments from an EU group entity to a group entity in a non-cooperative jurisdiction, e.g. the United Arab Emirates.
  • Deductible cross-border payments to a group entity that benefits from a preferential tax regime with respect to the payment, e.g. a patent box regime. Due to the retrospective element of DAC6, this may also include deductible cross-border payments made after 25 June 2018 from an EU group entity to a Swiss group entity with cantonal holding, mixed or administrative company status, if the preferential regime applied to the respective payments.
  • Receipt of advisory services from foreign third party intermediaries in relation to an arrangement, one of the main benefits of which is obtaining a tax advantage, if either (i) the relevant contracts include a confidentiality clause, (ii) the advice concerns an arrangement with standardised documentation/structure or (iii) the fees are based on the tax advantage obtained from the advice.

Are multinationals required to report?

In general, DAC6 imposes reporting requirements on intermediaries with certain ties to the European Union. Thus, if an EU intermediary is involved in the arrangement, e.g. if an EU tax adviser advises on the reportable transaction, the EU intermediary would do the reporting. However, multinational groups are likely to want to know whether and what information about them is reported.

Further, DAC6 stipulates a subsidiary reporting requirement for the relevant EU taxpayer (i.e. the party benefiting from an arrangement) if there is no EU intermediary to report the RCBA. This includes situations where the intermediary has no EU nexus or where the arrangement is developed in-house. For example, if the group tax department of a Swiss-headquartered group designs a reportable transaction between the Swiss parent entity and an EU subsidiary, the EU subsidiary will be required to report as a relevant taxpayer. The subsidiary reporting requirement may also apply if the EU intermediary is exempt from reporting due to legal professional privilege.

How to get ready for DAC6?

Multinational groups should be aware that reporting may occur under DAC6, regardless of whether they do the reporting themselves, or someone else reports. After all, it is information about them that is being reported to the tax authorities. This reinforces the need for multinational group across all industries to stay on top of the new rules and perform an impact assessment as soon as possible. Once the potentially reportable arrangements and the respective reporting parties have been identified, this should serve as a basis for the next steps, which should include:

  • Raising awareness across the organisation
  • Taking strategic decisions about whether to discontinue certain transactions
  • Training of involved staff
  • Building a robust governance framework with suitable policies, procedures and controls
  • Establishing adequate communication channels with third parties involved in relevant transactions (e.g. tax advisors or lawyers)
  • Creating a database for audit-proof documentation of arrangements, which the multinational decides are not reportable
  • Implementing a system or procedure for capturing information about reportable arrangements and reporting if required.

Without doubt, there is a lot to be done to get ready.

Our prior blog posts on DAC6 could also be interesting for you:

By: Robin King, Senior Manager and Marnix Kippersluis, Senior Consultant, Financial Services Tax 

If you would like to discuss more on this topic, please do reach out to one of the key contacts below:

Key contacts

Raoul Stocker_BLOG

Raoul Stocker - Partner, Business Tax

Raoul Stocker is a tax partner with more than 15 years’ experience specifically in international tax litigation such as mutual agreement procedures and advanced pricing agreements. His focus lies on corporate tax planning, cross-border structuring of corporate transactions and businesses, transfer pricing as well as taxation of financial institutions. Raoul is also a lecturer of transfer pricing and tax law at the University of St. Gallen.


Blog_Daniel stutzmann110x110

Daniel Stutzmann - Partner, International Tax

Daniel is a Tax Partner with more than 10 years of experience as an international corporate tax specialist. This includes a one year assignment in the US to lead the Swiss ICE Desk. Daniel has extensive experience in the area of cross-border structuring (like establishing tax efficient IP- and financing structures) as well as business reorganizations including large supply chain transformation projects. This also includes advising several multinationals in moving their worldwide/regional headquarters or central functions to Switzerland, while often establishing tax privileged Swiss principal companies. In his capacity as Swiss tax expert he has worked on a significant number of value chain alignment (“VCA”) projects, cross border restructuring and headquarter relocations.



Michael Grebe - Director, Financial Services Tax

Michael is a Director in the Financial Services Tax practice. He advises banks, trust companies, and insurers in relation to the interpretation and implementation of the global transparency related regimes. He has over ten years of experience in the financial industry covering a broad spectrum ranging from Process- over Project- to Product- Management. Prior to joining Deloitte, he led the FATCA and CRS implementation project for a global financial institution.


Robin King blog

Robin King - Senior Manager, Financial Services Tax

Robin is a Senior Manager working in Financial Services Tax. He is currently advising leading Swiss universal and private banks, acting as subject matter expert in the area of QI, FATCA , CRS and DAC6. Robin is the author of several articles on CRS. Prior to joining Deloitte, he worked as a cross-border tax compliance expert at a Swiss private bank.



Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.