Swiss Parliament approves Corporate Tax Reform III - Tax and Legal blog

Swiss Parliament approves Corporate Tax Reform III
On 17 June 2016, the two chambers of the Swiss parliament formally approved the Corporate Tax Reform III (CTR III), (for prior coverage, see the World Tax Advisor article dated 8 April 2016). The main objectives of the reform, which could become effective as soon as January 1, 2018, but more likely as of January 1, 2019, are to align Swiss tax law with international standards and to enhance Switzerland’s attractiveness as a location for multinational companies.

The reform would phase out all special corporate tax regimes, such as the mixed, domiciliary, holding and principal company regimes, as well as the Swiss finance branch regime. Federal and cantonal tax holidays would not be affected by the reform and would continue to be granted.

However, many Swiss companies that currently do not benefit from special tax privileges, as well as foreign companies that intend to migrate into Switzerland, could benefit from lower taxation under the reform.

A number of measures are included in the legislation on CTR III to compensate for the elimination of the beneficial tax regimes. The measures that aim to improve the attractiveness of Switzerland as a location include the following:

  • Reduction of the general tax rates (i.e. the cantonal/communal corporate tax rates) at the discretion of the individual cantons;
  • Introduction of a patent box that would be mandatory for all cantons and applicable to all patented intellectual property (IP) for which the R&D spend occurred in Switzerland (the OECD modified nexus approach);
  • Introduction of R&D incentives on a cantonal/communal level in the form of excess R&D deductions of up to 150% of qualifying expenditure, at the discretion of the individual cantons;
  • Allowance of a step-up (including for self-created goodwill) for direct federal and cantonal/communal tax purposes upon the migration of a company or of additional activities and functions to Switzerland;
  • Allowance of the tax-privileged release of hidden reserves for cantonal/communal tax purposes for companies transitioning out of tax-privileged cantonal tax regimes (such as mixed or holding companies) into ordinary taxation;
  • Introduction of a notional interest deduction (NID) regime at the federal level and at the cantonal/communal level the discretion of individual cantons (however, such cantons would be required to introduce a revenue-raising measure (discussed below) to partially compensate for introducing an NID); and
  • Reduction of the cantonal/communal annual net wealth tax in relation to the holding of participations, patented IP and inter-company loans at the discretion of the individual cantons.

Revenue-raising measure

Cantons that opt to introduce an NID on equity on a cantonal/communal level would be required to tax at a cantonal/communal level at least 60% of the dividend income received by individuals from qualifying participations of at least 10%, under the partial taxation regime for dividends. (Cantons currently tax 50% or less of such dividends at a cantonal/communal level.)

Main measures to attract multinational companies

Corporate tax rates: Many cantons would reduce their headline corporate tax rates that currently range from approximately 12% to 24% (combined federal/cantonal/communal rate). For example, Zug would reduce its effective tax rate to approximately 12%, Schaffhausen to 12.5%, Geneva to 13%, Fribourg to 13.72%, Vaud to 13.8% and St. Gallen to somewhere between 12% and 14.5%. Other cantons, such as Appenzell IR and Appenzell AR, Lucerne, Nidwalden, Obwalden and Schwyz already have very low effective tax rates for companies, of roughly between 12% and 14%.

Patent box: A patent box regime would be introduced for cantonal/communal tax purposes that would encompass qualifying patent income, provided the R&D spend in relation to the registered patent (or similar IP, such as supplementary protection certificates or first applicant protections) occurred in Switzerland. In addition, an uplift of up to 30% for actual related foreign R&D expense (e.g. removal and acquisition costs) would be granted. The Swiss patent box regime, therefore, would follow the modified nexus approach, as provided under action 5 of the OECD BEPS initiative.

Qualifying patent income would be calculated based on a residual method, i.e. all income of a company that is not specifically labelled as “nonpatent” income would be considered patent income. Nonpatent income would include (i) financing income; (ii) income from manufacturing, trading and other services not relying upon patents; (iii) income from routine functions; and (iv) income from trademarks. The cantons would be able to exempt up to 90% of the patent income from taxation for cantonal/communal tax purposes, which generally would result in an effective tax rate of as low as 10% on qualifying patent income.

R&D incentives: Cantons could introduce R&D incentives in the form of excess R&D deductions for tax purposes (i.e. super deductions) on a cantonal/communal level, to the extent of up to 150% of the R&D spend in Switzerland (the deduction for tax purposes would be up to 150% of the actual expense).

Step-up upon migration: A step-up would be allowed for direct federal and cantonal/communal tax purposes (including on self-created goodwill) for companies or additional activities and functions migrated to Switzerland. The step-up would have to be allocated to individual assets to the extent possible, and amortized according to the individual amortization period pertaining to such assets. The portion of the step-up that exceeds the fair market value of assets, i.e. goodwill, would have to be amortized over a period of 10 years. The same method for establishing the fair value would be applied for determining the exit tax for companies or activities and functions leaving Switzerland. The rationale for the step-up is that Switzerland, while levying a tax on exit, would not tax any increase in value that occurred outside the Swiss taxing jurisdiction.

Tax-privileged release of reserves: Companies transitioning out of tax-privileged cantonal tax regimes (such as mixed and holding companies) into ordinary taxation could release hidden reserves (including self-created goodwill) in a tax-privileged manner for cantonal/communal tax purposes within a period of five years, based on the rationale that such hidden reserves were not, or were only partially, subject to cantonal/communal taxation under these regimes. The hidden reserves would be taxed at a reduced rate when released, in a manner that would reduce the cantonal/communal tax rate of the company over a period of five years. The amount of hidden reserves (including goodwill) would have to be documented by a generally accepted valuation method and would be confirmed by the tax authorities; such confirmation would be binding. This mechanism could allow for favorable financial statement treatment, since no deferred tax asset should have to be set up under IFRS or US GAAP accounting standards.

NID: An NID would be granted on “surplus equity” (which would be defined per asset class) at the federal level and at the cantonal/communal level at the discretion of individual cantons. While many companies likely could benefit from the regime, it is designed to favor financing companies in particular. The permitted NID rate would be equal to the 10-year Swiss government bond yield. However, insofar as the surplus equity finances intra-group reveivables of all kinds, such as loans or trade receivables, an arm’s length interest rate could be applied on the respective surplus equity portion.

The combined tax reduction available through the patent box, the release of hidden reserves, the NID and the R&D super deduction would be limited to a maximum of 80% of the cantonal/communal taxes.Cantons can opt to introduce a lower percentage threshold.

Comments

The CTR III should help to attract more multinationals to Switzerland, as well as to keep existing multinationals in the country. The legislation would introduce a competitive corporate tax regime that is internationally accepted and fully takes into account the requirements of the OECD BEPS agenda.

A referendum that would result in a respective national vote has already been announced by the left and would likely be held in 2017, so that the law could become effective as soon as 1 January 2018, but more likely as of January 1, 2019.

Hess_BLOG

Jackie Hess - Managing Partner, Tax & Legal

Jackie is the Managing Partner for Tax & Legal and a member of the Swiss Executive team. She has more than 20 years of experience serving some of Deloitte’s largest multinational clients. Her areas of focus include business model optimization in the BEPS era, Swiss ruling and tax holiday negotiations, tax controversy, and audit defense. In addition, she has extensive experience in cross-border tax planning including substance reviews, IP structuring, and finance planning. Jackie’s industry focus is life sciences where she advises predominately US-listed companies in the biotech and medtech space that have their European headquarters in Switzerland.

Email

Rene Zulauf

René Zulauf - Partner, International Tax

René has more than 15 years of experience in the field of international tax structuring, financial services tax and Mergers & Acquisitions. He specializes in cross-border tax planning and has assisted numerous multinationals in particular in the establishment of Swiss finance and IP structures, as well as in the structuring of Swiss trading and principal/headquarter operations.

Email

Jacques Kistler

Jacques Kistler - Partner, International Tax

Jacques is the Lead Partner of our Corporate Tax service line in the French Speaking part of Switzerland, covering international tax and M&A. He has been a full time International Corporate Tax specialist for over 23 years.

Email 

Raoul Stocker_BLOG

Raoul Stocker - Partner, Business Tax Leader Zurich

Raoul Stocker is a tax partner with more than 15 years’ experience specifically in international tax litigation such as mutual agreement procedures and advanced pricing agreements. His focus lies on corporate tax planning, cross-border structuring of corporate transactions and businesses, transfer pricing as well as taxation of financial institutions. Raoul is also a lecturer of transfer pricing and tax law at the University of St. Gallen.

Email

McNeil_BLOG

David McNeil - Partner, Tax Management Consulting

David leads our tax accounting and tax management consulting teams for Switzerland. In his 18 years with Deloitte, David has advised on tax transformation projects assisting in the assessment of the tax risks associated with their business, the mapping of processes and controls and the education of their tax personnel to more effectively manage the tax processes and the tax related risks faced by their organisations.

Email  

Comments

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.