EU DAC6 Mandatory Disclosure Rules – Why should Swiss intermediaries care?
On 25 June 2018, an amendment to Directive 2011/16/EU, commonly referred to as “DAC6”, came into force, which may have significant impact on Swiss entities. DAC6 requires the disclosure of certain cross-border tax planning arrangements by way of a reporting to the local tax authorities. While the rules do not apply in Switzerland directly, Swiss intermediaries may nevertheless be affected if they have operations or otherwise provide services in any EU country. Even purely Swiss intermediaries that serve EU clients should carefully consider the impact of DAC6.
Any person that designs, markets, organises, makes available for implementation or manages the implementation of a reportable cross-border arrangement (or that provided aid, assistance or advice with respect to such arrangement) is considered to be an intermediary. If it also fulfils one of the following criteria, it is directly captured by the mandatory disclosure rules set out in the DAC6:
- Resident in an EU member state
- Provides the above services through a permanent establishment in an EU member state
- Is incorporated or governed by the laws of an EU member state
- Is registered with a professional association related to legal, taxation or consultancy services in an EU member state.
For example, a Swiss bank which maintains branches in one or more EU countries will be directly affected and will be considered to be an EU intermediary by the new rules. Likewise, a Swiss consultancy firm that is registered with an EU-based professional services association falls within the scope of DAC6. Additionally, any EU-incorporated entity that has its place of effective management in Switzerland will still be affected, even though the entity is considered tax resident in Switzerland. In all these cases, Swiss entities are considered Intermediaries and will be required to report certain cross-border arrangements to the respective EU tax authorities.
In addition, one further requirement will have an impact on Swiss entities, even if they have no presence in the EU. DAC6 contains provisions that require a tax resident of any EU member state to report the arrangement, in case no intermediary does. This means that any Swiss entity that advises on cross-border arrangements involving an EU resident client should understand the client service impact and consider informing its client of his or her reporting obligations. Practically speaking any intermediary that serves EU clients should be familiar with the mandatory disclosure rules imposed by the EU.
Next steps for Swiss entities
Swiss headquartered groups should identify entities directly affected, including assessing whether a Swiss entity is active in an EU country. Next, a potential intermediary should perform an impact assessment to identify whether the services provided are in-scope of DAC6.
In our discussions in the Swiss market, Swiss intermediaries are struggling to articulate the impact and next steps to internal stakeholders. We recommend that a Swiss intermediary consider for internal stakeholder discussions the end client impact for cross-border arrangements involving an EU tax resident.
Given that all relevant cross-border arrangements entered into after 25 June 2018 are in-scope, the time to act is now.
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
- Previous Switzerland still the leading international wealth management centre – but for how much longer?
- Next What defines digital leadership in European banking today?
Posted by: |